GOP threatens Queer Theory Professors in Georgia

Looks like this was published a few days ago but this is the first I'd heard about it....

http://www.onlineathens.com/stories/020709/gen_385535247.shtml

Steamy sex courses fire GOP's ire
Effort to oust profs
By Greg Bluestein  |  Associated Press  |  Story updated at 11:38 pm on 2/6/2009

ATLANTA - Upset House Republicans are mounting a campaign to purge Georgia's higher education system of professors with an expertise in racy sexuality topics as the state grapples with a $2.2 billion shortfall.

State Rep. Charlice Byrd, R-Woodstock, took the House well on Friday to announce a "grassroots" effort to oust professors with expertise in subjects like male prostitution, oral sex and "queer theory."

"This is not considered higher education," Byrd said. "If legislators are going to dole out the dollars, we should have a say-so in where they go."

Byrd and her supporters, including state Rep. Calvin Hill, R-Canton, said they will team with the Christian Coalition and other religious groups to pressure fellow lawmakers and the University System Board of Regents to eliminate the jobs.

"Our job is to educate our people in sciences, business, math," said Hill, a vice chairman of the budget-writing House Appropriations Committee. He said professors aren't going to meet those needs "by teaching a class in queer theory."

The regents, who oversee the state's colleges and universities, has bristled at attempts by legislators to dictate who they should hire. A regents spokesman said the university system's mission - teaching, research and service - is a broad field.

He said the state's schools hire faculty with expertise in a range of subjects as part of "a tradition of investigating the human experience." And he noted that they aren't teaching "how-to" courses, but rather they are experts on the sociological trends and risks.

"Certainly the mission of higher education is to broaden the field of knowledge and research," said spokesman John Millsaps. "That covers a lot of topics. Some may be considered to some as controversial, but to others it could be considered needed."

Hill and Byrd were incensed to learn a University of Georgia professor teaches a graduate course on "queer theory." They also took aim at Georgia State University, where an annual guide to its faculty experts lists a sociology lecturer as an expert in oral sex and faculty member Kirk Elifson as an expert in male prostitution.

Georgia State spokeswoman Andrea Jones called the critics' argument "flawed."

"Teaching courses in criminal justice, for example, does not mean that our students are being prepared to become criminals. Quite the opposite," said Jones. "Legitimate research and teaching are central to the development of relevant and effective policy."

Originally published in the Athens Banner-Herald on Saturday, February 07, 2009

Volunteer Workers on the Web

Beyond brand-hungry strivers, masses of free laborers—from coders building Linux open-source software to editors fine-tuning an entry on Wikipedia—continue to toil without ever seeing a payday, or even angling for one. Many find compensation in currencies that predate the market economy. These include praise from peers, a respected place within a community, victories in online contests, and satisfaction from helping others.

This is a really fascinating topic for me, people's motivation on the internet which is often not tied to monetary compensation. In fact, depending on the exact situation (as the article notes) money would upset the relationship. It does get much harder when the site itself -- unlike Wikipedia or open source projects -- is directly trying to make money.

"In unregulated, purely free markets, it isn't prosperity that is rewarded, it is winning"

Indeed. I suppose he doesn't believe in evolution either, not because he's conservative, but because evolution inherently follows the path that produces the most prosperity in a competitive medium, and it has come up with a balance of socializing infrastructure and risk with a layer of free market competition on top of that.

In unregulated, purely free markets, it isn't prosperity that is rewarded, it is winning. Lying, cheating, stealing, sabotaging the competition, monopolistic behaviour, and so forth are all much lower risk that innovation. In order for risks to be worth the benefits, the penalties must be minimized. If companies had to pay for all of their own R&D, nobody could risk failure or would go under. Spreading the cost means they can afford the risk and failure will just sting a little instead of putting them under.

These are basic economic concepts and well understood in competition mathematics like game theory. All modern first world countries have a mix of socialism and free-market capitalism. It's the ratio and details of what is socialized that vary. Ideologies are the axes into the socioeconomic space, they aren't the optimal point.

This needs to be taught in high school. This push towards "us versus them" ideological mentality is embarrassing in a modern society. It's treating politics like competing sports teams.

Sometimes it's worth it to read comments on Reddit

Facebook Privacy loophole when sending messages

I just noticed this message when I was responding to a message* on Facebook

If you send ---- ---- a message, you will give her permission to view your list of friends, as well as your Basic, Work and Education info for one month.

What? Just because I'm responding to a message someone sent me? I don't think that's very fair, Facebook!

*I really dislike receiving messages with actual content on Facebook. Hi, Facebook's messaging interface SUCKS. It doesn't fit into my email flow, it doesn't get archived (or at least the response doesn't) in my Gmail archive, I can't label it, tag it, or even file it away anywhere.

The End of Alone (video & article in Boston Globe)

It's really true... I've felt a little lost the last month until I got a cell phone (the one I'm still learning to use... see the previous entry on not knowing how to call people).

In some ways it's been freeing, to know that no one can try to call me. Or rather, that I can't really call anyone spontaneously.

In other ways, I do feel a little cut off. That's more related to being away from home and not making tons of new friends right away.

I haven't decided yet if I like not having a full "social calendar," and if this is more a time to recuperate, or 'lie fallow' as I like to call it. I guess I do like always seeing people and doing things.

It kind of conflicts with my perception of myself as a more quiet and introverted person, but it wouldn't be the first time I had a faulty self-image.